The probability of intransitivity of pairwise comparisons in individual preference (Q1122453): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(89)90017-6 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2072083441 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3738839 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Condorcet's paradox / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Probabilities of election outcomes for large electorates / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5586854 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Voting Anomalies, the Number of Voters, and the Number of Alternatives / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5561562 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 17:31, 19 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The probability of intransitivity of pairwise comparisons in individual preference
scientific article

    Statements

    The probability of intransitivity of pairwise comparisons in individual preference (English)
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    This study considers a model for the method by which an individual determines preference in pairwise comparisons on the basis of multiple attributes of comparison. The model is based on earlier work, by \textit{K. May} [Econometrica 22, 1-13 (1954)], that attempted to explain empirical results on pairwise comparisons. May's model is used to obtain estimates of the probability that an individual's complete set of pairwise responses is transitive. Results indicate that, with this model of preference determination, intransitivity should be expected to occur regularly in an individual's pairwise comparisons.
    0 references
    0 references
    probability of intransitivity
    0 references
    multiple attributes of comparison
    0 references
    pairwise comparisons
    0 references
    0 references