One-dimensional nonseparating plane continua with disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua (Q2639376): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4125468 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3209844 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Concerning Triodic Continua / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-8641(91)90014-d / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1999399389 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 08:39, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | One-dimensional nonseparating plane continua with disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua |
scientific article |
Statements
One-dimensional nonseparating plane continua with disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua (English)
0 references
1991
0 references
\textit{J. Krasinkiewicz} and \textit{P. Minc} [Bull. Acad. Polon. Sci., Sér. Sci. Math. Astron. Phys. 25, 283-289 (1977; Zbl 0354.54018)] showed that for any \(\lambda\)-dendroid X there is an \(\epsilon >0\) so that any two \(\epsilon\)-dense subcontinua of X must intersect. In this paper that result is extended to one-dimensional nonseparating plane triods, and this is used to show that any one-dimensional nonseparating plane continuum which, for each \(\epsilon >0\), has two disjoint \(\epsilon\)- dense subcontinua is either indecomposable or the union of two indecomposable continua. \textit{Knaster}, in private communication in 1972, asked whether each plane continuum which is the closure of a ray that limits on itself must contain an indecomposable continuum. \textit{D. Bellamy} and \textit{J. Krasinkiewicz} answered the question negatively in 1976 with a hereditarily decomposable example. In this paper it is shown that if such a continuum separates the plane into only finitely many components, then it must contain an indecomposable continuum, and if the continuum is one-dimensional, then it must be indecomposable.
0 references
plane continuum
0 references
\(\epsilon \) -dense subcontinua
0 references
indecomposable continuum
0 references