On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals (Q1374565): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Set profile property. |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Milan Tvrdý / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Milan Tvrdý / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 04:07, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals |
scientific article |
Statements
On the equivalence of McShane and Lebesgue integrals (English)
0 references
10 December 1997
0 references
It is known that a given function \(f:[a,b]\to \mathbb R\) is Lebesgue integrable on \([a,b]\) if and only if it is McShane integrable. (For the definition of the McShane integral, which is a sum type integral related to the Henstock-Kurzweil integral [see, e.g., Definition 16.7 in \textit{P.-Y. Lee}, ``Lanzhou lectures on Henstock integration'' (1989; Zbl 0699.26004)] The author gives a new proof of this result which does not rely on measure theory. In particular, he does not make use of the Egoroff and Luzin theorems.
0 references
McShane integral
0 references
Lebesgue integral
0 references