On the \(p\)-part of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer formula for multiplicative primes (Q1706764): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Normalize DOI.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.4310/CJM.2018.v6.n1.a1 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1704.06608 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.4310/CJM.2018.V6.N1.A1 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 05:11, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the \(p\)-part of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer formula for multiplicative primes
scientific article

    Statements

    On the \(p\)-part of the Birch-Swinnerton-Dyer formula for multiplicative primes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    28 March 2018
    0 references
    For an elliptic curve \(E\) over \(\mathbb{Q}\), an important and difficult problem is to determine the leading term of the \(L\)-function of \(E\). Recently, there have been remarkable progresses in the \(p\)-part of the leading term of \(L'(E,1)\) (called the \(p\)-part of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer formula) when \(E\) is of analytic rank one. The paper under review gives a proof of the \(p\)-part of the Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer formula for a semistable elliptic curve \(E/\mathbb{Q}\) of conductor \(N\) when \(E[p]\) is irreducible (\(p\mid N\) and \(p>3\)). Though it is a difficult task to treat the prime \(p\) which divides the conductor \(N\), the paper is well written and gives a very neat proof. To overcome the difficulty in the case of \(p\mid N\), the key method of the paper is to prove a two-variable analog of the Iwasawa-Greenberg main conjecture over the Hida family and, by specialization, deduce the Iwasawa-Greenberg main conjecture for the anticyclotomic Selmer group of \(E\) (under mild hypotheses) which is itself really worthy.
    0 references
    0 references
    Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer formula
    0 references
    elliptic curves
    0 references
    multiplicative reduction
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references