Uniqueness of optimal strategies in Captain Lotto games (Q1742138): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2686376907 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Competitive Optimality of Logarithmic Investment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3794956 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Discrete Colonel Blotto and general lotto games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Allocation games with caps: from Captain Lotto to all-pay auctions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Budget Deficits and Redistributive Politics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Colonel Blotto game / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Campaign spending regulation in a model of redistributive politics / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 11:33, 15 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Uniqueness of optimal strategies in Captain Lotto games
scientific article

    Statements

    Uniqueness of optimal strategies in Captain Lotto games (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    11 April 2018
    0 references
    The author studies a continuous \textit{Captain Lotto game} \(\Lambda_{c_A,c_B}(a,b)\), being some specific two-person zero-sum game with the following structure: There are two players \(A\) and \(B\). The game is described by four real numbers \(a, c_A, b\) and \(c_B\) such that \(0\leq a\leq c_A\) and \(0\leq b\leq c_B\) (\(\infty\) is possible for \(c_A\) and \(c_B\)). Player \(A\) chooses (a distribution of) a nonnegative random variable \(X\) with expectation \(E(X)=a\) and values bounded from above by \(c_A\), \(0\leq X\leq c_A\). Simultaneously Player \(B\) chooses (a distribution of) a nonnegative random variable \(Y\) with expectation \(E(Y)=b\) and values bounded from above by \(c_B\), \(0\leq Y\leq c_B\). The choices of \(X\) and \(Y\) are independent. The payoff function (from \(B\) to \(A\)) is defined by \(H(X,Y) = P(X>Y) - P(X<Y)\) where \(P\) denotes probability. The results of this paper are closely to the ones of \textit{S. Hart} in [Int. J. Game Theory 45, No. 1--2, 37--61 (2016; Zbl 1388.91004)] where he found optimal and \(\varepsilon\)-optimal strategies for both players in the Captain Lotto game \(\Lambda_{c_A,c_B}(a,b)\), in all cases of parameters \(c_A, c_B, a\) and \(b\). The author of the present paper shows for the game \(\Lambda_{c_A,c_B}(a,b)\) that \begin{itemize} \item[(1)] the optimal strategies for both players found by Hart are unique; \item[(2)] in some cases there is no optimal strategies for players \(A\) or \(B\); \item[(3)] any \(\varepsilon\)-optimal strategy for player \(A\) (when \(\varepsilon \rightarrow 0\)) can be fully characterized by its limit points. \end{itemize}
    0 references
    0 references
    allocation games
    0 references
    Colonel Blotto games
    0 references
    General Lotto games
    0 references
    two-person zero-sum games
    0 references
    uniqueness of optimal strategies
    0 references
    capacity constraints
    0 references
    0 references