Broyden updating, the good and the bad! (Q1946030): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Import IPFS CIDs |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Property / describes a project that uses | |||
| Property / describes a project that uses: L-BFGS / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
| Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
| Property / IPFS content identifier | |||
| Property / IPFS content identifier: bafkreidj6yhusaikvcxdm7gr36cyiklff5jyjsfrc4mrp6jr7ocavma57y / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Latest revision as of 10:23, 22 February 2025
scientific article
| Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
|---|---|---|---|
| English | Broyden updating, the good and the bad! |
scientific article |
Statements
Broyden updating, the good and the bad! (English)
0 references
17 April 2013
0 references
Summary: So far so good! We had an updating procedure (the `ful secant method') that seemed to work provided that certain conditions of linear independence were satisfied, but the problem was that it did not work very well. In fact, it proved to be quite numerically unstable. (cf. [\textit{C. G. Broyden}, On the discovery of the ``good Broyden'' method, Math. Program. 87, No. 2 (B), 209--213 (2000; Zbl 0970.90002)])
0 references
quasi-Newton
0 references
secant condition
0 references
least change
0 references
bounded deterioration
0 references
superlinear convergence
0 references
