Elaborating transition interface sampling methods (Q1780674): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Import241208061232 (talk | contribs)
Normalize DOI.
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.11.003 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: Publication / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2085933730 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: cond-mat/0405116 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996938 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Activation Energies from Transition Path Sampling Simulations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1016/J.JCP.2004.11.003 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 10:56, 11 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Elaborating transition interface sampling methods
scientific article

    Statements

    Elaborating transition interface sampling methods (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    13 June 2005
    0 references
    The need for detailed atomistic information through molecular simulation for the kinetics of processes in complex environment, when it is not easily experimentally accessible, has given rise to two new efficient methods for calculating rate constants. The calculation of reaction rate constants by computer simulation requires an expression for the rate constant in terms of microscopic properties. In transition path sampling (TPS) the rate constant is taken from a time derivative of a correlation function, while the transition interface sampling approach (TIS) measures a reactive flux through multiple dividing surfaces. The second method is a partial path of TIS (PPTIS), which mainly exploits the loss of long time correlation. The two new techniques TIS and PPTIS are compared according to their efficiency and their relation to TST-based methods is examined. TIS can be considered as an improvement upon the original TPS, while PPTIS improves the efficiency but relies on the assumption of memory loss between interfaces. The efficiency of both methods should be tested further by detailed simulation.
    0 references
    rare events
    0 references
    reaction rate
    0 references
    transition path sampling
    0 references
    transition interface sampling
    0 references

    Identifiers