On the classification of polar spaces (Q1312227): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q447750
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Helmut R. Salzmann / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the foundations of polar geometry. II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the foundations of polar geometry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Polar spaces having some line of cardinality two / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the embeddability of polar spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Polar spaces of arbitrary rank / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Semiquadratic sets and embedded polar spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Buildings of spherical type and finite BN-pairs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3263163 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:42, 22 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the classification of polar spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    On the classification of polar spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 January 1994
    0 references
    The authors provide a new proof of the theorem that each non-degenerate polar space \({\mathcal S}\) of rank at least 4 with no short lines (consisting of 2 points only) is classical. In a previous paper [Geom. Dedicata 44, No. 3, 349-358 (1992; Zbl 0772.51007)] they had constructed an embedding of a cone \(p^ \perp\) of \({\mathcal S}\) into a projective space. This embedding is used here to introduce a polarity already at this stage. The arguments then rely on the following theorem due to Tits: Let \(p_ i\) be a point of the non-degenerate polar space \({\mathcal S}_ i\) of rank at least 3 without short lines, and assume that \(p_ 1^ \perp\) is isomorphic to \(p_ 2^ \perp\). Then \({\mathcal S}_ 1\) is isomorphic to \({\mathcal S}_ 2\).
    0 references
    0 references
    polar space
    0 references
    embedding
    0 references