Existence of generalized nearest points (Q1811450): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Ren-Xing Ni / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Costica Mustăţa / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Ren-Xing Ni / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Costica Mustăţa / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.11650/twjm/1500407521 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4240937491 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 20:05, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Existence of generalized nearest points
scientific article

    Statements

    Existence of generalized nearest points (English)
    0 references
    10 March 2004
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a real Banach space of dimension at least \(2,\) and \(C\) a closed bounded convex subset of \(X\) with \(0\in \text{int } C,\) which is not necessarily symmetric. Let also \(P_{C}\) denote the Minkowski functional attached to the set \(C.\) If \(G\) is a nonempty closed subset of \(X\) and \(x\in X,\) then an element \(g_{0}\in G\) is called a generalized nearest point of \(x\) in \(G\) if \[ P_{C}( x-z_{0}) =d_{G}( x) :=\inf\{ P_{C}( x-z) :z\in G\} . \] The author studies the relations between the existence of generalized nearest points and the directional derivative of the function \(d_{G}.\) One shows that if \(d_{G}\) has the derivatives at \(x\) in any direction \(y\in\partial C\) (or \(-y\in\partial C\)) equal to \(1\) (resp. \(-1\)) then \(x\) has generalized nearest points in \(G.\) In the final part of the paper, one proves that if \(X\) is reflexive and \(C\) is strictly convex and has the Kadec-Klee property (\(\{ x_{n}\} \subset\partial C\) and \(x_{n}\to x_{0} \in\partial C\) weakly implies \(x_{n}\to x_{0}\) strongly), then the set \(\{ x\in X\setminus G:\exists y\in\partial C\) with \(d_{G}^{\prime }( x) ( y) =1\} \) is residual in \(X\setminus G.\)
    0 references
    generalized best approximation
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers