Decomposition of the diagonal map (Q1863511): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Jeffrey A. Strom / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Yuli B. Rudyak / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 04:59, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Decomposition of the diagonal map
scientific article

    Statements

    Decomposition of the diagonal map (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    11 March 2003
    0 references
    The author develops a new powerful technique which, in particular, allows him to control the behavior of the Ljusternik-Schnirelman category \(\text{cat}\) and weak Ljusternik-Schnirelman category \(\text{wcat}\) of spaces under attaching cells. This can be considered as a far developed generalization of the well-known Berstein-Hilton results. Given a space \(X\) and a natural number \(k\), let \(\wedge^k X\) be the \(k\)-fold smash-product and \(d: X \to \wedge^k X\) be the reduced diagonal. Given a subspace \(Y\) of \(X\), the weak category \(\text{wcat}_X Y\) is defined as the least \(k\) such that the composition \(d i: Y \to \wedge^k X\) is inessential; here \(i: Y \to X\) is the inclusion. Now, assume that \(X\) is \(CW\)-complex, \(L\) is a subcomplex of \(X\) and \(L=K\cup e^n\), where \(e^n \) is an attached cell. Denote by \(q: K \to S^n \) the quotient map. The author found a way to describe the maps \(h: S^n \to \wedge^k X\) such that \(qh=di\). Assuming that \(\text{wcat}_X L\leq k\), we conclude that \(\text{wcat}_X K \leq k\) whenever there exists an inessential \(h\) as above (and vice versa). Therefore we have a way to detect whether \(\text{wcat}_X K \leq k\). Similar results hold for category instead of weak category (the author mentions it, but does not formulate these results explicitly). As applications, the author obtains upper bounds for (weak) category. For example, if \(K\) is a subcomplex of \(X\) with \(\dim K \leq n\), then \(\text{wcat}_X K \leq \text{wcat}_X K^{(a-1)}+\text{wcat}_X K^{(b-1)}\) where \(a+b=n\). Another result (where \(u_r\in H^r(X;\pi^r(X))\) is the fundamental class) is the following. Let \(K\subset X\) be a subcomplex with \(\text{wcat}_X K^{(m-1)} \leq c\). Assume that \(u_{2^k(m+1)-1}^2=0\) for \(k=0,1, \ldots , t\). Then \(\text{wcat}_X K^{2^t(m+1)-1} \leq 2^t c\). The author also gets some estimates for \(\text{cat }Sp(n)\) (including a new proof of the equality \(\text{cat }Sp(2)=3\)), some estimates for the category of skeletons of certain free loop spaces, the category of 4-cell complexes, etc.
    0 references
    Ljusternik-Schnirelman category
    0 references
    Hopf invariant
    0 references
    cup-product
    0 references
    attaching cell
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers