Opial-type inequalities involving higher order derivatives (Q1842041): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Peter Y. H. Pang / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Peter Y. H. Pang / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jmaa.1995.1005 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4253058724 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 22:37, 19 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Opial-type inequalities involving higher order derivatives
scientific article

    Statements

    Opial-type inequalities involving higher order derivatives (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    15 October 1995
    0 references
    In the present paper, some new Opial-type integral inequalities are obtained, which generalize many known results due to the first author and \textit{E. Thandapani} [An. Ştiinţ. Univ. Al. I. Cuza Iaşi, N. Ser., Secţ. Ia 28, 123-126 (1982; Zbl 0556.26007)], \textit{W.-S. Cheung} [Mathematika 37, No. 1, 136-142 (1990; Zbl 0706.26015)], \textit{K. M. Das} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 22, 258-261 (1969; Zbl 0185.123)], \textit{B. G. Pachpatte} [J. Math. Anal. Appl. 120, 547-556 (1986; Zbl 0608.26009)], and \textit{G.-S. Yang} [Tamkang J. Math. 18, No. 4, 101-104 (1987; Zbl 0667.26011)]. Let \(x(t)\in C^{(n- 1)}[\alpha, T]\) be such that \(x^{(i)}(\alpha)= 0\), \(0\leq k\leq i\leq n- 1\) \((n\geq 1)\), \(x^{(n- 1)}(t)\) absolutely continuous on \((\alpha, T)\), and \(x^{(n)}(t)\) does not change sign on \((\alpha, T)\). Let \(p(t)\) and \(q(t)\) be nonnegative and measurable functions defined on \((\alpha, T)\). The main results of the paper are inequalities of the following form \[ \int^ T_ \alpha G_ i[x(s)] ds\leq K_ i\Biggl\{ \int^ T_ \alpha p(s)| x^{(n)}(s)|^ r \Biggr\}^{m_ i},\quad i= 1,2,3,\tag{A\(_ i\)} \] where \[ G_ 1[x(t)]= q(t)| x^{(k)}(t)| ^{r_ k} | x^{(n)}(t)|^{r_ n},\;G_ 2[x(t)]= q(t)\prod^ n_{k= 0} | x^{(k)}(t)|^{r_ k}, \] \[ G_ 3[x(t)]= q(t)| x^{(k)}(t) |^{r_ k} | x^{(k+ 1)}(t)|^{r_{k+1}}, \] and \(m_ 1= (r_ k+ r_ n)/r\), \(m_ 2= (r_ 1+\cdots+ r_ n)/ r\), \(m_ 3= (r_ k+ r_{k+ 1})/r\); \(r> 1\), \(r_ 0,\dots, r_ n\) are real numbers subject to some additional conditions, and \(K_ i\) are some nonnegative real constants depending on \(p,q,r_ 0,\dots, r_ n\), \(r\), \(\alpha\), and \(T\). \{Reviewer's remark: (i) To derive (2.6) from (2.5), we need the positivity (instead of the nonnegativity) of the function \(p\); (ii) The inverse inequalities of \((\text{A}_ i)\) given herein should be reproved if possible. Because, with \(T\) \((T\geq t)\) as the upper limit of integration, the first equality sign of (2.1) ought to be replaced by the inequality sign ``\(\leq\)''\}.
    0 references
    higher order derivatives
    0 references
    Hölder's inequality
    0 references
    Opial-type integral inequalities
    0 references

    Identifiers