An adoption decision model of emerging capital budgeting methodologies (Q840607): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q592936 |
Set profile property. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / author | |||
Property / author: Xiao-Lin Li / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 02:21, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | An adoption decision model of emerging capital budgeting methodologies |
scientific article |
Statements
An adoption decision model of emerging capital budgeting methodologies (English)
0 references
13 September 2009
0 references
Summary: Two emerging methodologies for capital budgeting are real options (RO) and economic value added (EVA). Embracing EVA or RO is not a small undertaking for a firm. Given the extent of the change involved, we recommend that firm adopt these new approaches sequentially. We develop a methodology adoption decision model (MADM) for determining which methodology a firm should adopt first. The MADM focuses on the theoretical soundness and the practical applicability of the methodology. We conclude that EVA is more likely to be embraced by the industry than RO. We therefore recommend that management first focus on EVA adoption.
0 references
decision analysis
0 references
capital budgeting
0 references
real options
0 references
economic value added (EVA)
0 references