A second order perturbation expansion for small singular values (Q788792): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q688169 |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Thomas Kaijser / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(84)90128-9 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2015138396 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Error and Perturbation Bounds for Subspaces Associated with Certain Eigenvalue Problems / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A note on the perturbation of singular values / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Rank Degeneracy / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:51, 14 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A second order perturbation expansion for small singular values |
scientific article |
Statements
A second order perturbation expansion for small singular values (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
Let X be an \(n\times p\) matrix and let \(\tilde X=X+E\) be a perturbation of X. In this paper the author presents a formula for the square of the smallest singular value of \(\tilde X\) with an error of order \(0(\| E\|^ 3)\). Unfortunately, it is not easy to decode the formula. I believe that the reference [2] on page 232 should be [1], but even so quite a lot of deskwork is needed before one can understand the notations used in the formula. Moreover it is not easy to see how the lemma, by which the formula follows, should be proved. The author refers to Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.2 of [1] (the latter does not exist and shall probably be Theorem 4.3), but it is not trivial to see how these theorems imply the lemma in the paper.
0 references
small singular values
0 references
symmetric eigenvalue problem
0 references
perturbation
0 references
conformal partition
0 references
0 references