A second order perturbation expansion for small singular values (Q788792): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q688169
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Thomas Kaijser / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(84)90128-9 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2015138396 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Error and Perturbation Bounds for Subspaces Associated with Certain Eigenvalue Problems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A note on the perturbation of singular values / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rank Degeneracy / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:51, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A second order perturbation expansion for small singular values
scientific article

    Statements

    A second order perturbation expansion for small singular values (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let X be an \(n\times p\) matrix and let \(\tilde X=X+E\) be a perturbation of X. In this paper the author presents a formula for the square of the smallest singular value of \(\tilde X\) with an error of order \(0(\| E\|^ 3)\). Unfortunately, it is not easy to decode the formula. I believe that the reference [2] on page 232 should be [1], but even so quite a lot of deskwork is needed before one can understand the notations used in the formula. Moreover it is not easy to see how the lemma, by which the formula follows, should be proved. The author refers to Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.2 of [1] (the latter does not exist and shall probably be Theorem 4.3), but it is not trivial to see how these theorems imply the lemma in the paper.
    0 references
    small singular values
    0 references
    symmetric eigenvalue problem
    0 references
    perturbation
    0 references
    conformal partition
    0 references

    Identifiers