Menger curvature and rectifiability (Q1306680): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q697665
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Jean-Christophe Léger / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2159429610 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: math/9905212 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:04, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Menger curvature and rectifiability
scientific article

    Statements

    Menger curvature and rectifiability (English)
    0 references
    14 May 2001
    0 references
    The background of the main theorem proved in the interesting paper under review lies in the well-known Vitushkin conjecture dealing with sets which are removable for bounded analytic functions. A compact set in the plane is called removable for bounded analytic functions if all bounded analytic functions on its complement are constant. Furthermore, a Borel set \(E\subset\mathbb R^n\) is said to be rectifiable if there are Lipschitz functions \(f_i:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R^n\), \(i=1,2,\dots\), such that \(\mathcal H^1(E\setminus\bigcup_{i=1}^\infty f_i(\mathbb R))=0\). The set \(E\) is purely unrectifiable if \(\mathcal H^1(E\cap f(\mathbb R))=0\) for any Lipschitz function \(f:\mathbb R\to\mathbb R^n\). Here \(\mathcal H^1\) is the 1-dimensional Hausdorff measure. According to the Vitushkin conjecture a compact subset of the plane with positive and finite 1-dimensional Hausdorff measure is removable for bounded analytic functions if and only if it is purely unrectifiable. The proof of the conjecture was completed by \textit{G. David} in the remarkable paper [Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 14, No. 2, 369-479 (1998; Zbl 0930.30012)]. For detailed description of many important contributions done by several people in the process of solving the conjecture see the survey by \textit{G. David} [Publ. Mat., Barc. 43, No. 1, 3-25 (1999)]. In the paper under review the author proves that a Borel set \(E\subset\mathbb R^n\) with \(0<\mathcal H^1(E)<\infty\) is rectifiable provided that it has finite total Menger curvature, that is, \[ c^2(E)=\int_E\int_E\int_Ec^2(x,y,z)\mathcal H^1(x)\mathcal H^1(y)\mathcal H^1(z) <\infty, \] where \(c(x,y,z)\) is the inverse of the radius of the circle whose circumference passes through the points \(x\), \(y\), and \(z\). This result is used by G. David in his proof of the Vitushkin conjecture and it was earlier proved by him in an unpublished paper. The author points out that, compared to the one given by G. David, his proof has the benefit that it is quite easy to extend to dimensions higher than 1.
    0 references
    Menger curvature
    0 references
    rectifiability
    0 references
    Vitushkin conjecture
    0 references

    Identifiers