The first modern definition of the sum of a divergent series: An aspect of the rise of 20th century mathematics (Q1302117): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q54272451, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1710897659913
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070050036 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1982246393 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q54272451 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:30, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The first modern definition of the sum of a divergent series: An aspect of the rise of 20th century mathematics
scientific article

    Statements

    The first modern definition of the sum of a divergent series: An aspect of the rise of 20th century mathematics (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 March 2000
    0 references
    The work of Ernesto Cesàro (1859-1906) on divergent series during the 1880s was initially influenced by mathematicians at Naples and at Liège (Catalan). Until 1882 Cesàro used symbolic methods (umbral calculus). Then he employed means and asymptotic laws, in analogy to number theoretic functions, and also a probabilistic approach. Only in 1890 he defined the sum of a divergent series in the way that became named after him. The author views this as a case study on the transition from the earlier conception of a mathematical definition (as describing something that was already given by intuition or nature) to the modern mode (definitions as creating mathematical objects). [Reviewer's remark: This transition is a case of what is often termed loss of ontology.] In contrast to earlier historiography it is claimed here that Frobenius (1880), Hölder (1882) and Stieltjes (1882) remained within the bounds of the ordinary conception of a sum and did not intend to define summability methods. Their results, though, were transformed into such methods by Hardy and others.
    0 references
    E. Cesàro
    0 references
    divergent series
    0 references

    Identifiers