Some binomial coefficient congruences (Q809118): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q1071043 |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Betty Garrison / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Binomial Coefficients Modulo a Prime / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Two \(p^ 3\) variations of Lucas' theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 17:21, 21 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Some binomial coefficient congruences |
scientific article |
Statements
Some binomial coefficient congruences (English)
0 references
1991
0 references
\textit{É. Lucas} [Sur les congruences des nombres Eulériens et des coefficients différentiels des fonctions trigonométriques, suivant un module premier, Bull. Soc. Math. Fr. 6, 49-54 (1878; JFM 10.0139.04)] has proved that if p is prime, \(n,r,n_ 0,r_ 0\) are nonnegative integers, \(n_ 0<p\), \(r_ 0<p\), then \(\left( \begin{matrix} np+n_ 0\\ rp+r_ 0\end{matrix} \right)\equiv \left( \begin{matrix} n\\ r\end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix} n_ 0\\ r_ 0\end{matrix} \right)(mod p)\). It is now proved that if p is prime, n,r,i are nonnegative integers, \(0<i<p\), then \[ \left( \begin{matrix} np\\ rp+i\end{matrix} \right)\equiv (r+1)\left( \begin{matrix} n\\ r+1\end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix} p\\ i\end{matrix} \right)(mod p^ 2). \] It is also shown that if \(p\geq 5\) is prime, \(i>0\), \(0\leq n\leq m\), \(0\leq k<p\), then \[ \left( \begin{matrix} mp^ 2\\ np^ 2+kp+i\end{matrix} \right)\equiv (n+1)\left( \begin{matrix} m\\ n+1\end{matrix} \right)\left( \begin{matrix} p^ 2\\ kp+i\end{matrix} \right)(mod p^ 3). \] The first proof proceeds by induction on n and the second by induction on m.
0 references