Formal theories of knowledge in AI and robotics (Q1079021): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4951952 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3929077 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: First-order dynamic logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5604443 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Semantical Analysis of Modal Logic I Normal Modal Propositional Calculi / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:06, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Formal theories of knowledge in AI and robotics
scientific article

    Statements

    Formal theories of knowledge in AI and robotics (English)
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    Theories of knowledge representation are described in abstract fashions. First, the theory of epistemic logic (EL) is briefly reviewed, distinguishing it from ordinary logics in an operator K called the knowledge operator (Kp, for instance, is read ''The agent knows a fact p.'') and in the semantics of the logic. Special axioms and rules are provided involving the operator K. Dynamic logic (DL) similar to EL is also introduced in order to describe actions. Then two approaches are introduced, which are necessary in dealing with knowledge and actions required. One is the interpreted-symbolic-structures approach and the other the situated-automata approach. In the latter approach, an intelligent system considered is regarded as an automaton which recognizes its surroundings and gives necessary responses. In both approaches, EL and DL play fundamental roles. It is mentioned that some of the ideas described are already being applied to the author's robot research.
    0 references
    knowledge representation
    0 references
    epistemic logic
    0 references
    Dynamic logic
    0 references
    actions
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references