Conflict and distribution (Q1806206): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q1317321
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Joan Maria Esteban / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1999.2549 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2044739107 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Social conflict and growth. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Measurement of Polarization / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Conflict and distribution / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Power, growth, and the voracity effect / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Empirics for growth and distribution: Stratification, polarization, and convergence clubs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Contest success functions / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 08:53, 29 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Conflict and distribution
scientific article

    Statements

    Conflict and distribution (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    20 December 1999
    0 references
    The aim of the paper is to study the relationship between conflict and the shape of the frequency distribution of individuals over a given set of alternative preferences. An outcome is viewed as a realization of a lottery, where outcome probabilities are related to the share of resources expended by each ``interest'' group. Conflict is defined as the equilibrium sum of resources dissipated in the struggle for preferred outcomes. Existence of conflict equilibrium is proved and sufficient conditions for uniqueness are given. Some other results are the following: (1) an increase in the utility distance between any pair of groups leads to an increase of conflict; (2) conflict is maximized at some symmetric bimodal distribution of the population in case groups' preferences are symmetric; (3) the uniform distribution of population over three groups is a local but never global maximizer of conflict in the case of pure contests; (4) in the situation of contests, the larger a group the more contentious it is; (5) the relationship between the pattern of conflict and the groups' weigths and positions in the structure of preferences can be very complicated in general; (6) at some point an extremist situation changes to a moderate one as extremist groups shrink in population size.
    0 references
    model of conflict
    0 references
    conflict equilibrium
    0 references
    groups' preferences
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references