Iterated deferred correction for linear two-point boundary value problems (Q1915480): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set profile property. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / describes a project that uses | |||
Property / describes a project that uses: COLSYS / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 05:14, 5 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Iterated deferred correction for linear two-point boundary value problems |
scientific article |
Statements
Iterated deferred correction for linear two-point boundary value problems (English)
0 references
27 October 1996
0 references
This paper deals with the numerical solution of two-point boundary value problems by the so-called iterated deferred correction. [For a precise statement of this procedure and a study of its convergence see: \textit{R. D. Skeel}, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 19, 171-196 (1982; Zbl 0489.65051)]. Here the authors propose deferred corrections based on successive application of symmetric implicit Runge-Kutta methods which increase the order by two units in each iteration. In the first part of the paper a study of the linear stability of Gaussian and Lobatto IIIC formulas is presented. More precisely they require that the numerical solutions provided by the method for \(y'(x) = \lambda y (x)\), \(x \in [x_0, x_N]\) be bounded for \(y_0\) given and \(\text{Re }\lambda \leq 0\) and \(y_\nu\) given and \(\text{Re } \lambda \geq 0\). Then, they show that Lobatto IIC methods can be written as mono-implicit Runge-Kutta methods and by using the previous experience of one of the authors with this type of methods in the numerical solution of two-point boundary value problems, they have constructed a code that uses Lobatto formulas up to order eight. Finally, some numerical experiments comparing the behaviour of two standard codes: COLSYS and TWPBVP (available from NETLIB) and two new codes based on successive application of Gauss and Lobatto formulas, are presented. The main conclusions derived from these numerical experiments are that the new codes have a good stability. Further, the code based on Lobatto formulas has the advantage of a lower computational cost than the Gaussian code.
0 references
two-point boundary value problems
0 references
iterated deferred correction
0 references
symmetric implicit Runge-Kutta methods
0 references
linear stability
0 references
Gaussian and Lobatto IIIC formulas
0 references
numerical experiments
0 references