On error estimation in the conjugate gradient method and why it works in finite precision computations (Q1866487): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
 
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 05:00, 5 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On error estimation in the conjugate gradient method and why it works in finite precision computations
scientific article

    Statements

    On error estimation in the conjugate gradient method and why it works in finite precision computations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 December 2003
    0 references
    The authors show that the lower bound for the \(A\)-norm of the error based on Gauss quadrature is mathematically equivalent to the original formula of \textit{M. R. Hestenes} and \textit{E. Stiefel} [J. Res. Natl. Bur. Stand. 49, 409-435 (1952; Zbl 0048.09901)]. Existing bounds are compared and the authors demonstrate the necessity of a proper roundoff error analysis with an example of the well-known bound that fails in finite precision arithmetic. The numerical stability of the simplest bound is proved. In addition a lower bound for the Euclidean norm is described. The results are illustrated by numerical examples.
    0 references
    conjugate gradient method
    0 references
    Gauss quadrature
    0 references
    convergence
    0 references
    error bounds
    0 references
    finite precision arithmetic
    0 references
    rounding errors
    0 references
    loss of orthogonality
    0 references
    numerical stability
    0 references
    numerical examples
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references