On a characterization of lattices by the betweenness relation --- on a problem of M. Kolibiar (Q1179772): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Zur Axiomatik der teilweise geordneten Mengen / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3934450 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Characterization of the Lattice Orderings on a Set which Induce a given Betweenness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The geometry of normed lattices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3240266 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Charakterisierung der Verbände durch die Relation „Zwischen”︁ / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Transitivities of Betweenness / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Applications of transitivities of betweenness in lattice theory / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:57, 15 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On a characterization of lattices by the betweenness relation --- on a problem of M. Kolibiar
scientific article

    Statements

    On a characterization of lattices by the betweenness relation --- on a problem of M. Kolibiar (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    27 June 1992
    0 references
    A ternary relation \(R\) on a lattice \(L\) is called a betweenness relation on \(L\) if \((a,b,c)\in R\) is defined by \((a\land b)\lor(b\land c)=b=(a\lor b)\land(b\lor c)\). \textit{M. Kolibiar} [Z. Math. Logik Grundlagen Math. 4, 89--100 (1958; Zbl 0087.26002)] proved that a ternary relation \(R\) on a set \(L\) is the betweenness relation of some lattice structure on \(L\) iff it satisfies four conditions labeled (A), (B), (C), and (F). These conditions are explicitly described in the current paper, but are too complicated to reproduce here. The point is that Kolibiar proved the independence of the first three conditions, but left open the independence of (F) from the remaining conditions. In the current paper, the question is answered in the affirmative. There are also some interesting results on the question of whether the ternary betweenness relation on (distributive) lattices has a first-order axiomatization.
    0 references
    segment
    0 references
    convex sublattice
    0 references
    ternary relation
    0 references
    betweenness relation
    0 references
    first-order axiomatization
    0 references

    Identifiers