Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent? (Q643466): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.01.004 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2051261237 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4940743 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5810358 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4732438 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5338106 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. II / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Schrödinger's interpretation of quantum mechanics and the relevance of Bohr's experimental critique / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:06, 4 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?
scientific article

    Statements

    Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    31 October 2011
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    quantum mechanics
    0 references
    wave mechanics
    0 references
    matrix mechanics
    0 references
    equivalence
    0 references
    isomorphism
    0 references
    Niels Bohr's atom
    0 references
    0 references