Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:643466)
Recommendations
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. II
- On the equivalence of matrix mechanics and wave mechanics
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1243188
- From canonical transformations to transformation theory, 1926--1927: the road to Jordan's ``Neue Begründung
- Born-Jordan quantization and the equivalence of the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures
Cites work
- A comparison of the meaning and uses of models in mathematics and the empirical sciences
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 4118331 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1406842 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3210892 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3070269 (Why is no real title available?)
- Schrödinger's interpretation of quantum mechanics and the relevance of Bohr's experimental critique
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. I
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. II
Cited in
(5)- To envision a new particle or change an existing law? Hypothesis formation and anomaly resolution for the curious case of the \({\beta}\) decay spectrum
- On the equivalence of matrix mechanics and wave mechanics
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. II
- From canonical transformations to transformation theory, 1926--1927: the road to Jordan's ``Neue Begründung
- Quantum mechanics, radiation, and the equivalence proof
This page was built for publication: Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q643466)