Born-Jordan quantization and the equivalence of the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures
From MaRDI portal
(Redirected from Publication:474896)
Abstract: The aim of the famous Born and Jordan 1925 paper was to put Heisenberg's matrix mechanics on a firm mathematical basis. Born and Jordan showed that if one wants to ensure energy conservation in Heisenberg's theory it is necessary and sufficient to quantize observables following a certain ordering rule. One apparently unnoticed consequence of this fact is that Schr"odinger's wave mechanics cannot be equivalent to Heisenberg's more physically motivated matrix mechanics unless its observables are quantized using this rule, and not the more symmetric prescription proposed by Weyl in 1926, which has become the standard procedure in quantum mechanics. This observation confirms the superiority of Born-Jordan quantization, as already suggested by Kauffmann. We also show how to explicitly determine the Born--Jordan quantization of arbitrary classical variables, and discuss the conceptual advantages in using this quantization scheme. We finally suggest that it might be possible to determine the correct quantization scheme by using the results of weak measurement experiments.
Recommendations
- From Weyl to Born-Jordan quantization: the Schrödinger representation revisited
- The angular momentum dilemma and Born-Jordan quantization
- Born-Jordan quantization. Theory and applications
- Preferred quantization rules: Born-Jordan versus Weyl. The pseudo-differential point of view
- Born-Jordan quantization and the uncertainty principle
Cites work
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3116475 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3167699 (Why is no real title available?)
- scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3109251 (Why is no real title available?)
- Born-Jordan quantization and the uncertainty principle
- Imprints of the quantum world in classical mechanics
- Preferred quantization rules: Born-Jordan versus Weyl. The pseudo-differential point of view
- Symplectic Methods in Harmonic Analysis and in Mathematical Physics
- Symplectic covariance properties for Shubin and Born-Jordan pseudo-differential operators
- Symplectic geometry and quantum mechanics
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. I
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. II
- Unambiguous quantization from the maximum classical correspondence that is self-consistent: the slightly stronger canonical commutation rule Dirac missed
- Understanding Heisenberg's ``magical paper of July 1925: a new look at the calculational details
- Weak values of a quantum observable and the cross-Wigner distribution
Cited in
(15)- The phase space formulation of time-symmetric quantum mechanics
- On the invertibility of Born-Jordan quantization
- Time-frequency analysis of Born-Jordan pseudodifferential operators
- From Weyl to Born-Jordan quantization: the Schrödinger representation revisited
- On the symplectic covariance and interferences of time-frequency distributions
- Born-Jordan quantization and the uncertainty principle
- Unambiguous quantization from the maximum classical correspondence that is self-consistent: the slightly stronger canonical commutation rule Dirac missed
- Quantum mechanics, radiation, and the equivalence proof
- The angular momentum dilemma and Born-Jordan quantization
- Phase spaces, parity operators, and the Born-Jordan distribution
- Born-Jordan quantization. Theory and applications
- Gabor frames of Gaussian beams for the Schrödinger equation
- Born-Jordan pseudodifferential operators with symbols in the Shubin classes
- Comment on: ``Critical assessment of the Schrödinger picture of quantum mechanics: [Phys. Lett. A 305 (2002) 322]
- Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?
This page was built for publication: Born-Jordan quantization and the equivalence of the Schrödinger and Heisenberg pictures
Report a bug (only for logged in users!)Click here to report a bug for this page (MaRDI item Q474896)
