To envision a new particle or change an existing law? Hypothesis formation and anomaly resolution for the curious case of the \({\beta}\) decay spectrum
From MaRDI portal
Publication:2437510
DOI10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.11.002zbMath1282.81206OpenAlexW1985390479MaRDI QIDQ2437510
Publication date: 3 March 2014
Published in: Studies in History and Philosophy of Science. Part B. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics (Search for Journal in Brave)
Full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2013.11.002
History of mathematics in the 20th century (01A60) History of quantum theory (81-03) Nuclear physics (81V35) Quantum scattering theory (81U99) Physics (00A79)
Cites Work
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Unnamed Item
- Modelling abduction in science by means of a modal adaptive logic
- The equivalence myth of quantum mechanics. I
- `Modernists with a vengeance': changing cultures of theory in nuclear science, 1920--1930
- Bohr, Heisenberg and the divergent views of complementarity
- Why were matrix mechanics and wave mechanics considered equivalent?
- Niels Bohr's generalization of classical mechanics
- Abductive reasoning. Logical investigations into discovery and explanation
- Patterns of abduction
- Controversy and consensus: nuclear beta decay 1911--1934
- Pauli versus Heisenberg: A case study of the heuristic role of philosophy
- Abduction of Generalizations
- Sommerfeld and Ehrenfest – generalising the Bohr model
- Advice on Abductive Logic
- Bohr and the Photon
- The earliest missionaries of the Copenhagen spirit
- Pauli's Exclusion Principle
- Abduction and induction. Essays on their relation and integration
This page was built for publication: To envision a new particle or change an existing law? Hypothesis formation and anomaly resolution for the curious case of the \({\beta}\) decay spectrum