Selecting a portfolio of nonhomogeneous R \& D proposals (Q1060951): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(85)90155-9 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1982594260 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Measurable Multiattribute Value Functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pyramid and Semicube Decompositions of Multiattribute Utility Functions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4180077 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Parametrically Dependent Preferences for Multiattributed Consequences / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5639713 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Evaluating Proposals Using Decision Analysis / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:24, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Selecting a portfolio of nonhomogeneous R \& D proposals
scientific article

    Statements

    Selecting a portfolio of nonhomogeneous R \& D proposals (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    This article reports a procedure developed to assist the U.S. Department of Energy in the selection of a portfolio of proposals addressing the design and manufacture of components of solar photovoltaic arrays, and complete photovoltaic systems. Considerations such as the relative importance of the different components in the overall effort, compatibility of the proposed designs, and budgetary and programmatic issues were complicating factors. The technical quality for each proposal was represented by multiple evaluation measures. These were combined into a single index through the use of a multiattribute utility function. Indices representing the relative importance of the various components were then developed, and results in measurable value theory were applied to derive an index of technical quality of a portfolio of proposals. The problem was then formulated as an integer program. It was solved by using an interactive branch and bound code that allowed for sensitivity analysis before selecting the portfolio of proposals for funding. The procedure was successfully applied to funding a portfolio of proposals aimed at reducing the cost of producing photovoltaic arrays, and to several other government-sponsored procurements.
    0 references
    resource allocation
    0 references
    government
    0 references
    selection of a portfolio
    0 references
    multiattribute utility function
    0 references
    interactive branch and bound code
    0 references

    Identifiers