Peirce and Dedekind: the definition of finite set (Q1062967): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0315-0860(85)90019-9 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2035217582 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5344971 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: C. S. Peirce's Philosophy of Infinite Sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Peirce's place in mathematics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4082752 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3922632 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3885733 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:51, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Peirce and Dedekind: the definition of finite set
scientific article

    Statements

    Peirce and Dedekind: the definition of finite set (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    In critically analyzing the contributions of Dedekind and Peirce to the axiomatic theory of natural numbers the author is able to bring out the salient features of Dedekind's contribution as well as to point out to what extent Peirce's similar contributions should be acknowledged, although his claims of priority are unjustified. Peirce had given an axiomatic definition of natural numbers similar to Dedekind and developed a symbolic language to prove that such numbers also have the property of ``finiteness''. But Dedekind was the first to show that cardinal numbers with the property of ``finiteness'' as definable through Cantor's distinction of finite and infinite sets, namely only infinite sets allow one to one mappings onto its own subsets, must also be natural numbers as defined axiomatically.
    0 references
    0 references
    axiomatic definitions of natural numbers
    0 references
    symbolic language
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers