Ranking multiple criteria alternatives with half-space, convex, and non- convex dominating cones: Quasi-concave and quasi-convex multiple attribute utility functions (Q1121756): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0548(79)90023-6 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2003879039 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Comparative Study of Flow-Shop Algorithms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Heuristic Algorithm for the <i>n</i> Job, <i>m</i> Machine Sequencing Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Functional Heuristic Algorithm for the Flowshop Scheduling Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5650198 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A General Bounding Scheme for the Permutation Flow-Shop Problem / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:40, 19 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Ranking multiple criteria alternatives with half-space, convex, and non- convex dominating cones: Quasi-concave and quasi-convex multiple attribute utility functions
scientific article

    Statements

    Ranking multiple criteria alternatives with half-space, convex, and non- convex dominating cones: Quasi-concave and quasi-convex multiple attribute utility functions (English)
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    It is demonstrated how a multiple attribute utility function (MAUF) can be expressed as a quasi-concave or quasi-convex function using non-unique weights. The author discusses three types of local information on weights: unique (half-space), partial information on unique (convex- cone), and non-unique (nonconvex cone). A simple method for assessing such a MAUF including evaluating and ranking is discussed.
    0 references
    multiple attribute utility function
    0 references
    local information on weights
    0 references

    Identifiers