Counting Hopf Galois structures on non-abelian Galois field extensions (Q1305027): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Uniqueness of hopf galois structure for separable field extensions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hopf algebras and Galois theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3941595 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hopf Galois theory for separable field extensions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Classification of the Hopf Galois structures on prime power radical extensions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Combinatorial structure on the automorphism group of \(S_ 6\) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3941589 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:51, 28 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Counting Hopf Galois structures on non-abelian Galois field extensions
scientific article

    Statements

    Counting Hopf Galois structures on non-abelian Galois field extensions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    4 May 2000
    0 references
    If \(L/K\) is a \(G\)-Galois extension of fields, then it is quite possible that \(L/K\) is also Hopf Galois for various Hopf algebras \(H\) which are different from the obvious choice \(H=K[G]\). In particular it was observed by Pareigis and the reviewer that such a ``genuinely Hopf'' Galois structure exists as soon as \(G\) is not abelian. The paper under review provides information on the number \(h(G)\) of such Hopf structures for some particular nonabelian groups \(G\). (The number \(h(G)\) is indeed independent of \(L/K\), since the whole theory of separable Hopf Galois extensions can be formulated exclusively in terms of groups and actions.) One corollary is that for \(G=S_n\) and \(n\geq 5\) there are at least \(\sqrt{n!}\) of them. A little more precisely: The number \(n(G)\) is the sum of the numbers \(e(G,N)\) (whose definition we omit) over all groups \(N\) of same order as \(G\). For given \(G\), the question for which \(N\) the number \(e(G,N)\) is nonzero seems to be a tricky one. In the situation at hand, \(e(S_n,S_n)\) and \(e(S_n,A_n\times C_2)\) are both calculated exactly, which gives the above lower bound for \(h(S_n)\). The methods are essentially elementary, but they do invoke quite a few nontrivial results from group theory.
    0 references
    Hopf Galois extensions
    0 references
    holomorphs
    0 references
    symmetric groups
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references