Counting Hopf Galois structures on non-abelian Galois field extensions (Q1305027): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Uniqueness of hopf galois structure for separable field extensions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Hopf algebras and Galois theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3941595 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Hopf Galois theory for separable field extensions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Classification of the Hopf Galois structures on prime power radical extensions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Combinatorial structure on the automorphism group of \(S_ 6\) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3941589 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 21:51, 28 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Counting Hopf Galois structures on non-abelian Galois field extensions |
scientific article |
Statements
Counting Hopf Galois structures on non-abelian Galois field extensions (English)
0 references
4 May 2000
0 references
If \(L/K\) is a \(G\)-Galois extension of fields, then it is quite possible that \(L/K\) is also Hopf Galois for various Hopf algebras \(H\) which are different from the obvious choice \(H=K[G]\). In particular it was observed by Pareigis and the reviewer that such a ``genuinely Hopf'' Galois structure exists as soon as \(G\) is not abelian. The paper under review provides information on the number \(h(G)\) of such Hopf structures for some particular nonabelian groups \(G\). (The number \(h(G)\) is indeed independent of \(L/K\), since the whole theory of separable Hopf Galois extensions can be formulated exclusively in terms of groups and actions.) One corollary is that for \(G=S_n\) and \(n\geq 5\) there are at least \(\sqrt{n!}\) of them. A little more precisely: The number \(n(G)\) is the sum of the numbers \(e(G,N)\) (whose definition we omit) over all groups \(N\) of same order as \(G\). For given \(G\), the question for which \(N\) the number \(e(G,N)\) is nonzero seems to be a tricky one. In the situation at hand, \(e(S_n,S_n)\) and \(e(S_n,A_n\times C_2)\) are both calculated exactly, which gives the above lower bound for \(h(S_n)\). The methods are essentially elementary, but they do invoke quite a few nontrivial results from group theory.
0 references
Hopf Galois extensions
0 references
holomorphs
0 references
symmetric groups
0 references