A note on univalent functions starlike with respect to a boundary point (Q1399879): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5179675 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the class of functions starlike with respect to a boundary point / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On a Conjecture of M. S. Robertson / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4052427 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4000499 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Univalent functions starlike with respect to a boundary point / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 18:53, 5 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A note on univalent functions starlike with respect to a boundary point |
scientific article |
Statements
A note on univalent functions starlike with respect to a boundary point (English)
0 references
30 July 2003
0 references
Let \(D\) be the open unit disc of the complex plane. For \(\alpha> 0\), let \(B(\alpha)\) denote the class of all analytic functions \(w:D\to D\) such that \((1-w(z))/(1-z)\) has angular limit \(\alpha\) at \(1\). It is known that if \(f\) has angular limit 0 at 1 and \(f\) is starlike with respect to the boundary point origin (i.e., if \(f(D)\) is starlike with respect to \(0\in\partial (f(D)))\) then there exists \(w\in B(\alpha)\) (for some \(0<\alpha <1)\) such that \[ (1-z)^2{f'(z) \over f(z)}= -4{1-w(z)\over 1+w(z)} (z\in D)\tag{1} \] The authors obtain a converse of this theorem with a weaker condition of \(f\) (namely that if \(f\) has an asymptotic value 0 at \(z=1\) and has a representation (1) for some \(w\in B(\alpha)\) then \(f\) is starlike with respect to the boundary point origin.) The proof is geometric in nature and is interesting.
0 references