Structural damage localization by the principal eigenvector of modal flexibility change (Q1736782): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.3390/a9020024 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2341062769 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Generalized-order perturbation with explicit coefficient for damage detection of modular beam / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A new damage identification method based on structural flexibility disassembly / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996164 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3407275 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Damage Detection in Structures Using Changes in Flexibility / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 21:52, 18 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Structural damage localization by the principal eigenvector of modal flexibility change
scientific article

    Statements

    Structural damage localization by the principal eigenvector of modal flexibility change (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    26 March 2019
    0 references
    Summary: Using the principal eigenvector (PE) of modal flexibility change, a new vibration-based algorithm for structural defect localization was presented in this paper. From theoretical investigations, it was proven that the PE of modal flexibility variation has a turning point with a sharp peak in its curvature at the damage location. A three-span continuous beam was used as an example to illustrate the feasibility and superiority of the proposed PE algorithm for damage localization. Furthermore, defect localization was also performed using the well-known uniform load surface approach for comparison. Numerical results demonstrated that the PE algorithm can locate structural defects with good accuracy, whereas the ULS approach occasionally missed one or two defect locations. It was found that the PE algorithm may be promising for structural defect assessment.
    0 references
    defect localization
    0 references
    principal eigenvector
    0 references
    modal flexibility variation
    0 references
    deflection
    0 references
    vibration
    0 references

    Identifiers