On a cell decomposition of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane. (Q1769931): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Introduction to Grothendieck duality theory / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Some theorems on actions of algebraic groups / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4126461 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the homology of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3328651 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2004681780 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 09:28, 30 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On a cell decomposition of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane. |
scientific article |
Statements
On a cell decomposition of the Hilbert scheme of points in the plane. (English)
0 references
31 March 2005
0 references
The authors compute a cell decomposition of the Hilbert scheme \(\text{Hilb}^d(\mathbb{P}^2)\) induced by the theorem of \textit{A. Bialynicki-Birula} [Ann. Math.~(2)~98, 480--497 (1973; Zbl 0275.14007)] when applied to the natural torus action. The existence of such a decomposition was already used by the authors to compute the Betti numbers of \(\text{Hilb}^d(\mathbb{P}^2)\) [Invent. Math. 87, 343--352 (1987; Zbl 0625.14002)] and can be explicitly given by a slight modification of the argument used there. Each cell is in some \(\text{Hilb}^d(\mathbb{A}^2)\) and is constructed via invariant ideals of colength \(d\) having a prescribed resolution (in this way, they are parametrized by the partitions of \(d\)). The authors construct to each partition a corresponding quasifinite and flat family of subschemes. It should be noted that this family is not always finite over their base (as used in the paper), however, the main results still hold due to the corrections of \textit{M. Huibregtse} [Invent. Math. 160, 165--172 (2005; Zbl 1064.14005)].
0 references