Some free constructions in realizability and proof theory (Q1903677): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4740070 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3795831 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An elementary characterization of categories of separated objects / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On localization and stabilization for factorization systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cartesian bicategories. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3691902 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3995720 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3671978 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Discrete Objects in the Effective Topos / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Colimit completions and the effective topos / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 07:48, 24 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some free constructions in realizability and proof theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Some free constructions in realizability and proof theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    19 June 1996
    0 references
    In this paper, the ``effective topos'' [cf. \textit{J. M. E. Hyland}, in: The L. E. J. Brower Centen. Symp., Stud. Logic Found. Math. 110, 165-216 (1982; Zbl 0522.03055)]\ is revisited as a free colimit construction, basically as done by \textit{E. Robinson} and \textit{G. Rosolini} [J. Symb. Logic 55, No. 2, 678-689 (1990; Zbl 0713.18003)]. Explicitly, the effective topos arises as the exact completion of the lex category \({\mathcal F}\) obtained from \({\mathcal S}ets\) by freely adjoining sums indexed by subsets of the natural numbers object \(N\), but only allowing morphisms between such sums to be encoded by restrictions of partial recursive endomorphisms of \(N\). Thus construction is here compared with that of gluing sets along the inclusion of the small category \(\mathcal R\) of subsets of \(N\) and restrictions of partial recursive endomorphisms of \(N\). The author then shows that the stack completion of the exact completion of the lex category \({\mathcal R}\) mentioned above, is a full reflective subcategory of the effective topos which is cocomplete, the latter using properties of the reflector. This treatment of the (alas, still unanswered) question of the possible existence, within a realizability topos such as the effective topos, of a small complete category in which to model polymorphism, is to be contrasted with that of \textit{J. M. E. Hyland}, \textit{E. P. Robinson} and \textit{G. Rosolini} [Proc. Lond. Math. Soc., III. Ser. 60, No. 1, 1-36 (1990; Zbl 0703.18002)]. To the latter, the authors begin by considering an obviously complete (yet not obviously small or not small) full subcategory of the effective topos, namely a suitable category \(orth(A)\), of objects orthogonal to a regular projective well supported object \(A\), and then carving out, within it, a small category whose externalization has \(orth(A)\) as stack completion. The paper being reviewed is highly readable as well as instructive in matters related to free completions and to the connection between stack completions and stable factorization systems arising from a full reflective subcategory of a regular category.
    0 references
    effective topos
    0 references
    free colimit construction
    0 references
    exact completion
    0 references
    lex category
    0 references
    stack completion
    0 references
    full reflective subcategory
    0 references
    polymorphism
    0 references
    stable factorization systems
    0 references
    regular category
    0 references

    Identifiers