A preconditioned Krylov subspace method for the solution of least squares problems in inverse scattering (Q1913714): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1996.0027 / rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jcph.1996.0027 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2106158414 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1006/JCPH.1996.0027 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 12:46, 16 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A preconditioned Krylov subspace method for the solution of least squares problems in inverse scattering |
scientific article |
Statements
A preconditioned Krylov subspace method for the solution of least squares problems in inverse scattering (English)
0 references
2 July 1996
0 references
The paper concerns the solution of large least squares (LS) problems by means of iterative methods. It starts with a brief survey of well-known methods such as SIRT, ART, CG, etc. Then, the authors present two preconditioned Krylov subspace methods to solve undetermined LS problems. They show that one of the methods has no breakdown and that the other is more efficient. To analyze the convergence behavior, a relation between the residual error and the eigenvalues of the preconditioned matrix is presented. As an important application of their method the authors consider an example arising in seismic scattering. In this case, under reasonable assumptions on the data, the authors are able to obtain a suitable preconditioner from the high-frequency asymptotics of the underlying problem. The derivation of such preconditioner is presented in the appendix. The paper concludes with a careful numerical comparison among the results obtained by applying their methods and other ones insofar as rate of convergence is concerned. The experiments indicate that the proposed preconditioned Krylov methods are three times faster than conjugate gradient for the large seismic examples under consideration.
0 references
inverse scattering
0 references
large least squares problems
0 references
iterative methods
0 references
preconditioned Krylov subspace methods
0 references
convergence
0 references
seismic scattering
0 references
numerical comparison
0 references
conjugate gradient
0 references