Function spaces and contractive extensions in approach theory: the role of regularity (Q2014746): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2053577884 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1212.6398 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On continuous extensions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4018784 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A quasitopos containing CONV and MET as full subcategories / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Extensions of contractions and uniform contractions on dense subspaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Continuous convergence in partially ordered sets / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:47, 8 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Function spaces and contractive extensions in approach theory: the role of regularity
scientific article

    Statements

    Function spaces and contractive extensions in approach theory: the role of regularity (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 June 2014
    0 references
    It is well-known that a regular convergence space \(Y\) has the following two properties for each convergence space \(X\): (1) Whenever a filter \(\mathcal F\) on \(Y^X\) converges in the continuous convergence structure to a mapping \(f \in Y^X\) then \(f\) is continuous. (2) If \(S\) is a strict subspace of \(X\) and \(f : S \to Y\) a continuous mapping then \(f\) can be continuously extended to a continuous mapping \(F : X \to Y\). The problem of whether (1) or (2) actually characterize the regularity of \(Y\) had only partial answers. The authors study related problems for convergence approach spaces. Introducing the notion of the default of a function -- which somehow measures how far it is away from being a contraction -- they prove various results which in particular show that (1) and (2) are indeed necessary and sufficient for the regularity of a convergence space \(Y\). Reviewer's remark: Corollary 12 is not a consequence of Theorem 11 and is not true if \(X\) is only assumed to be topological.
    0 references
    regularity
    0 references
    strong regularity
    0 references
    convergence space
    0 references
    convergence approach space
    0 references
    strict subspace
    0 references
    contractive extension
    0 references
    continuous extension
    0 references
    default of a function
    0 references
    continuous convergence
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references