Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications (Q2500911): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4023085 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/asp/2006/31520 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2065948537 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:29, 30 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications
scientific article

    Statements

    Nonmyopic sensor scheduling and its efficient implementation for target tracking applications (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 August 2006
    0 references
    Summary: We propose two nonmyopic sensor scheduling algorithms for target tracking applications. We consider a scenario where a bearing-only sensor is constrained to move in a finite number of directions to track a target in a two-dimensional plane. Both algorithms provide the best sensor sequence by minimizing a predicted expected scheduler cost over a finite time-horizon. The first algorithm approximately computes the scheduler costs based on the predicted covariance matrix of the tracker error. The second algorithm uses the unscented transform in conjunction with a particle filter to approximate covariance-based costs or information-theoretic costs. We also propose the use of two branch-and-bound-based optimal pruning algorithms for efficient implementation of the scheduling algorithms. We design the first pruning algorithm by combining branch-and-bound with a breadth-first search and a greedy-search; the second pruning algorithm combines branch-and-bound with a uniform-cost search. Simulation results demonstrate the advantage of nonmyopic scheduling over myopic scheduling and the significant savings in computational and memory resources when using the pruning algorithms.
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers