Mean-variance hedging under transaction costs (Q2460042): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Eric Beutner / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Eric Beutner / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00186-006-0134-9 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1983717406 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4099504 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Functional analysis and infinite-dimensional geometry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Local Risk-Minimization Under Transaction Costs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4252521 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Multidimensional Variance-Optimal Hedging in Discrete-Time Model-A General Approach / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Quadratic Cost Criteria for Option Hedging / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Variance-Optimal Hedging in Discrete Time / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 12:01, 27 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Mean-variance hedging under transaction costs
scientific article

    Statements

    Mean-variance hedging under transaction costs (English)
    0 references
    14 November 2007
    0 references
    An incomplete financial market is considered with a non-risky assets and \(d\) risky ones. There are proportional transaction costs denoted \((\lambda_i,\mu_i,i= 1,\dots, d)\). Only self-financing strategies are used. At terminal time \(T\), the global risk to be minimized for the contingent claim is \[ E[(H- x- G_T(\theta))^2], \] where \(x\) is the initial wealth, \(\theta^i= l^i\) if \(i\)th is bought, \(m^i\) if it is sold, the terminal gain is \[ G_T(\theta)= \sum^{T-1}_{t=0} [-\langle(1+ \lambda) l_t, S_t\rangle+ \langle(1- \mu) m_t, S_t\rangle]+ \Biggl\langle \sum^{T-1}_{t= 0} l_t, S_t\Biggr\rangle- \Biggl\langle\sum^{T-1}_{t= 0} m_t, S_T\Biggr\rangle. \] A sufficient condition for arbitrage opportunity absence is given, namely ``no free lunch in \(L^2\) condition'': \(\forall C_1> 0\), \(\exists C_2\in ]0,C_1[\) such that for any strategy \(\theta\) satisfying \(\| G_T(\theta)\|_2\geq C_1\), then \(G^-_T(\theta)\geq C_2\). Then, under suitable conditions on the price processes, the set \(\{G_T(\theta)\), \(\theta\) admissible\} is closed in \(L^2\), thus there exists for every contingent claim \(H\) and every initial wealth \(x\) a global risk minimizing strategy under transaction costs.
    0 references
    Hedging
    0 references
    Transaction costs
    0 references
    Mean-variance-hedging
    0 references
    Self-financing
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers