When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (Q1063984): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4749035 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Bayesian Analysis of the Linear Calibration Problem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4768493 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3260921 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 18:05, 14 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? |
scientific article |
Statements
When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
We assume as model a standard multivariate regression of y on x, fitted to a controlled calibration sample and used to estimate unknown x's from observed y-values. The standard weighted least squares estimator ('classical', regress y on x and 'solve' for x) and the biased inverse regression estimator (regress x on y) are compared with respect to mean squared error. The regions are derived where the inverse regression estimator yields the smaller MSE. For any particular component of x this region is likely to contain 'most' future values in usual practice. For simultaneous estimation this needs not be true, however.
0 references
controlled calibration sample
0 references
weighted least squares estimator
0 references
biased inverse regression estimator
0 references
mean squared error
0 references