When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (Q1063984): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4749035 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A Bayesian Analysis of the Linear Calibration Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4768493 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3260921 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:05, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations?
scientific article

    Statements

    When is the inverse regression estimator MSE-superior to the standard regression estimator in multivariate controlled calibration situations? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    We assume as model a standard multivariate regression of y on x, fitted to a controlled calibration sample and used to estimate unknown x's from observed y-values. The standard weighted least squares estimator ('classical', regress y on x and 'solve' for x) and the biased inverse regression estimator (regress x on y) are compared with respect to mean squared error. The regions are derived where the inverse regression estimator yields the smaller MSE. For any particular component of x this region is likely to contain 'most' future values in usual practice. For simultaneous estimation this needs not be true, however.
    0 references
    controlled calibration sample
    0 references
    weighted least squares estimator
    0 references
    biased inverse regression estimator
    0 references
    mean squared error
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers