On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation (Q1282392): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The multichannel log-derivative method for scattering calculations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An eighth-order formula for the numerical integration of the one- dimensional Schrödinger equation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5606948 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The deferred approach to the limit in ordinary differential equations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5846799 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Numerical calculation of wavefunctions near a strongly repulsive potential / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:22, 28 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation
scientific article

    Statements

    On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation (English)
    0 references
    30 May 1999
    0 references
    The goal of the note is to compare the classical fourth order Numerov method with another more recent eighth order method introduced by \textit{A. C. Allison, A. D. Raptis} and \textit{T. E. Simos} [J. Comput. Phys. 97, No. 1, 240-248 (1991; Zbl 0753.65064)] for the equation \[ d^2y(r)/dr^2+(c_6r^{-6}-c_{12}r^{-12}+k^2)y(r)=0 \] with boundary conditions \[ y(0)=0,\qquad y(r)\to A(\sin kr+\tan \delta \cos kr) \text{ as } r\to \infty, \] where \(c_6\), \(c_{12}\), \(k\), \(A\), \(\delta\) are constants. It is concluded that caution is needed when applying any finite difference method to solve a differential equation with singularities. As might be expected, the numerical tests show that the eighth order formula is more accurate than Numerov's method, but also that the Allison's formula is flattered by the above mentioned equation example (proposed also in Allison's paper) because the wave function grows significantly just when the local truncation error decreases acceptably.
    0 references
    boundary value problems
    0 references
    second order linear ordinary differential equations
    0 references
    Numerov's method
    0 references
    Schrödinger equation
    0 references
    finite difference method
    0 references
    eighth order formula
    0 references
    wave function
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references