On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation (Q1282392): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The multichannel log-derivative method for scattering calculations / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: An eighth-order formula for the numerical integration of the one- dimensional Schrödinger equation / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5606948 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The deferred approach to the limit in ordinary differential equations / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5846799 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Numerical calculation of wavefunctions near a strongly repulsive potential / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 18:22, 28 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation |
scientific article |
Statements
On an eighth order formula for solving a Schrödinger equation (English)
0 references
30 May 1999
0 references
The goal of the note is to compare the classical fourth order Numerov method with another more recent eighth order method introduced by \textit{A. C. Allison, A. D. Raptis} and \textit{T. E. Simos} [J. Comput. Phys. 97, No. 1, 240-248 (1991; Zbl 0753.65064)] for the equation \[ d^2y(r)/dr^2+(c_6r^{-6}-c_{12}r^{-12}+k^2)y(r)=0 \] with boundary conditions \[ y(0)=0,\qquad y(r)\to A(\sin kr+\tan \delta \cos kr) \text{ as } r\to \infty, \] where \(c_6\), \(c_{12}\), \(k\), \(A\), \(\delta\) are constants. It is concluded that caution is needed when applying any finite difference method to solve a differential equation with singularities. As might be expected, the numerical tests show that the eighth order formula is more accurate than Numerov's method, but also that the Allison's formula is flattered by the above mentioned equation example (proposed also in Allison's paper) because the wave function grows significantly just when the local truncation error decreases acceptably.
0 references
boundary value problems
0 references
second order linear ordinary differential equations
0 references
Numerov's method
0 references
Schrödinger equation
0 references
finite difference method
0 references
eighth order formula
0 references
wave function
0 references
0 references