On a conjectured inequality for the largest zero of Jacobi polynomials (Q1014766): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Luigi Gatteschi's work on asymptotics of special functions and their zeros / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Conjectured inequalities for Jacobi polynomials and their largest zeros / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:11, 1 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On a conjectured inequality for the largest zero of Jacobi polynomials
scientific article

    Statements

    On a conjectured inequality for the largest zero of Jacobi polynomials (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    29 April 2009
    0 references
    Recently [\textit{W. Gautschi} and \textit{P. Leopardi}, Numer. Algorithms 45, No.~1--4, 217--230 (2007; Zbl 1124.33009)], it was conjectured that, given \(\alpha>-1\), \(\beta>-1\), the largest zeros \(x_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}=\cos\theta_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}\), \(n=1,2,\dots\), of the Jacobi polynomials \(P_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}(x)\) satisfy the inequality \(n\theta_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}<(n+1)\theta_{n+1}^{(\alpha,\beta)}\) for all \(n>1\) iff this inequality holds true for \(n=1\). In the present paper, the author shows that the domain in the \((\alpha,\beta)\) plane of validity of the above inequality for all \(n\geq1\) requires some more detailed description. Namely, it is known that the \(n\)-large asymptotics of the Jacobi polynomial \(P_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}(x)\) in some region of the independent variable \(x\) can be described in terms of the Bessel function \(J_{\alpha}\). Taking into account four initial terms in the asymptotic expansion in \(n^{-1}\) of the ratio \(\theta_n^{(\alpha,\beta)}/\theta_{n+1}^{(\alpha,\beta)}\), the author observes a certain domain in the \((\alpha,\beta)\)-plane where the considered inequality is false for all sufficiently large \(n\) even though it holds true for \(n=1\). The paper is concluded by a new conjecture concerning the above inequality.
    0 references
    0 references
    Jacobi polynomials
    0 references
    zeros
    0 references
    asymptotics
    0 references
    inequalities
    0 references
    0 references