Quality assurance competition strategy under B2C platform (Q1723644): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q59123615 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Vertical product differentiation and two-sided markets / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 07:05, 18 July 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Quality assurance competition strategy under B2C platform
scientific article

    Statements

    Quality assurance competition strategy under B2C platform (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    19 February 2019
    0 references
    Summary: This paper examines the platform competition strategy in offering quality assurance policy based on two-sided B2C markets with buyers and sellers who trade through the B2C platform. We model this as a strategy decision whether control rights of quality assurance level are better held by the seller or by the platform. Whether the seller or the platform that provides quality assurance policy is preferred depends on their influence on network effects. We show that the seller and the platform have no strong intention to improve the quality assurance level in the monopoly markets. When all buyers multihome and all sellers single-home, sellers who hold the control rights of quality assurance are better than platforms. However, platforms that hold quality assurance drive more profits than sellers in the B2C markets where all buyers and all sellers multihome. Our findings connect platform competitive strategies to market and microfoundation of quality, which applies directly to managerial decisions in the B2C two-sided platform.
    0 references

    Identifiers