Lindelöf domination versus \(\omega\)-domination of discrete subsets (Q2300117): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q122111960, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711196317277 |
||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q122111960 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 14:56, 23 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Lindelöf domination versus \(\omega\)-domination of discrete subsets |
scientific article |
Statements
Lindelöf domination versus \(\omega\)-domination of discrete subsets (English)
0 references
26 February 2020
0 references
For a space \(X\) and families \(\mathcal{A}, \mathcal{B}\) of subsets of \(X\) say that \(\mathcal{A}\) is dominated by \(\mathcal{B}\) if each member of \(\mathcal{A}\) is a subset of the closure of some member of \(\mathcal{B}\). When \(\mathcal{B}\) consists of all countable (Lindelöf) subsets, say that all members of \(\mathcal{A}\) are \(\omega\)-(Lindelöf) dominated. If \(d(X)\le s(X)<\mathfrak{w}\) then all discrete subsets of \(X\times X\) are \(\omega\)-dominated if and only if \(X\) is separable. A perfect space in which all closed discrete subsets are Lindelöf dominated has countable cellularity. Examples are given of perfect regular (resp.\,normal) spaces in which all discrete subsets are Lindelöf dominated but there is a closed, discrete subset that it not \(\omega\)-dominated; the respective example requires the existence of a \(Q\)-set.
0 references
Lindelöf domination
0 references
\(\omega\)-domination
0 references
countable spread
0 references
countable cellularity
0 references
perfect space
0 references
perfectly normal space
0 references
almost discretely Lindelöf space
0 references