Revision: variance inflation in regression (Q1952490): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Latest revision as of 11:10, 6 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Revision: variance inflation in regression |
scientific article |
Statements
Revision: variance inflation in regression (English)
0 references
31 May 2013
0 references
Summary: Variance Inflation Factors (VIFs) are reexamined as conditioning diagnostics for models with intercept, with and without centering regressors to their means as oft debated. Conventional VIFs, both centered and uncentered, are flawed. To rectify matters, two types of orthogonality are noted: vector-space orthogonality and uncorrelated centered regressors. The key to our approach lies in feasible Reference models encoding orthogonalities of these types. For models with intercept it is found that (i) uncentered VIFs are not ratios of variances as claimed, owing to infeasible Reference models; (ii) instead they supply informative angles between subspaces of regressors; (iii) centered VIFs are incomplete if not misleading, masking collinearity of regressors with the intercept; and (iv) variance deflation may occur, where ill-conditioned data yield smaller variances than their orthogonal surrogates. Conventional VIFs have all regressors linked, or none, often untenable in practice. Beyond these, our models enable the unlinking of regressors that can be unlinked, while preserving dependence among those intrinsically linked. Moreover, known collinearity indices are extended to encompass angles between subspaces of regressors. To reaccess ill-conditioned data, we consider case studies ranging from elementary examples to data from the literature.
0 references
ratios of variances
0 references
conventional VIFs
0 references
ill-conditioned data
0 references
0 references
0 references