On Browkin's conjecture about the elements of order five in \(K_2(\mathbb Q)\) (Q2372581): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Introduction to Algebraic K-Theory. (AM-72) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Relations between \(K_2\) and Galois cohomology / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Torsion in \(K_ 2\) of fields / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Elements of small order in K2F / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: The minimum of a binary quartic form. I / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q2708737 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A conjecture on a class of elements of finite order in \(K_2F_{\mathfrak p}\) / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A class of torsion elements in \(K_{2}\) of a local field / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 13:00, 26 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On Browkin's conjecture about the elements of order five in \(K_2(\mathbb Q)\) |
scientific article |
Statements
On Browkin's conjecture about the elements of order five in \(K_2(\mathbb Q)\) (English)
0 references
30 July 2007
0 references
Based on the work of Lenstra (letter to Browkin, May 1981), a succinct proof of Browkin's conjecture that the elements of order five in \(K_2(\mathbb Q)\) can be written as a product of elements of the form \(\{a, \Phi_5(a)\}\), where \(a\in\mathbb Q^*\), is given. Here, as usual, \(K_2\) denotes Milnor's group and \(\Phi_n\) is the \(n\)th cyclotomic polynomial. However, the author only makes use of a classical result of \textit{C. S. Davis} [Acta Math. 84, 263--298 (1951; Zbl 0042.04502)] on binary quartic forms instead of Zantema's idea and van der Geer's results used in Lenstra's proof. It is stated that a similar method can be used to prove similar results on the elements of order ten or twelve in \(K_2(\mathbb Q)\).
0 references
\(K_2\) group
0 references
cyclotomic polynomial
0 references
lattice
0 references
binary quartic form
0 references