Mass operator and dynamical implementation of mass superselection rule (Q1949805): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: 1205.1372 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On unitary ray representations of continuous groups / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3786658 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Operational Quantum Physics / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On Galilei invariance in quantum mechanics and the Bargmann superselection rule / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3909512 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 10:19, 6 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Mass operator and dynamical implementation of mass superselection rule |
scientific article |
Statements
Mass operator and dynamical implementation of mass superselection rule (English)
0 references
17 May 2013
0 references
As shown by Bargmann in 1954 Galileian invariance implies a superselection rule for the masses of a non-relativistic quantum mechanical system, i.e. a formal superposition of pure states with different mass values does not represent a pure state. In several papers, Giulini stressed that the usual Galileian interpretation of de-coherence effect does not allow any dynamical approach. Instead, he re-interpreted Bargmann's rule within another framework assuming a central extension of the Galileian group which provides an explicit mass operator. The present paper is organized as follows. After explaining the details of a specific Hamiltonian and the underlying Hilbert space, Giulini's approach is reviewed from a more mathematical point of view, thereby proposing some improvements of his framework. The mass operator is modified so as to obtain a positive discrete spectrum. The model remains to be invariant under time reversal. However, another degree of freedom arises describing a conserved internal charge. Everything here relies on the hypothesis that the mass operator has a discrete spectrum. This assumption guarantees the validity of the presented results. There does not seem to exist any general physical a-priori principle justifying this assumption.
0 references
quantum mechanical system
0 references
mass operator
0 references
Galileian invariance
0 references
superselection rule
0 references
de-coherence
0 references
central extension
0 references