On the structure of stationary sets (Q995720): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: math/0311514 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Local Clubs, Reflection, and Preserving Stationary Sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Projective Stationary Sets and a Strong Reflection Principle / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Martin's maximum, saturated ideals, and nonregular ultrafilters. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some combinatorial problems concerning uncountable cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Saturation Properties of Ideals in Generic Extensions. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Topics in set theory. Lebesgue measurability, large cardinals, forcing axioms, rho-functions / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:08, 26 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the structure of stationary sets
scientific article

    Statements

    On the structure of stationary sets (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 September 2007
    0 references
    This paper investigates relationships between various types of stationary subsets of~\([\kappa]^\omega\) for various~\(\kappa\) (larger than~\(\aleph_1\)). These are club, local club, full, projective, reflective and spanning (for definitions consult the paper). Under the Weak Reflection Principle, which states that for every stationary set~\(S\subseteq[\kappa]^\omega\) there exists a set \(X\) of size \(\aleph_1\) such that \(\omega_1\subseteq X\) and \(S\cap[X]^\omega\) is stationary, we obtain two groups of three equivalent notions. There are also connections with semiproper and stationarity-preserving forcing notions, e.g., \(S\) is spanning iff \(P_S\) is semiproper, where \(P_S\) shoots an \(\omega_1\)-chain through~\(S\), and it it stationarity-preserving iff \(S\)~is projective. The paper is worth reading.
    0 references
    stationary set
    0 references
    projective stationary set
    0 references
    stationary reflection principles
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references