Second order and \(L^ p\)-comparisons between the boostrap and empirical Edgeworth expansion methodologies (Q1118922): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
m rollbackEdits.php mass rollback
Tag: Rollback
Normalize DOI.
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1214/aos/1176347008 / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1214/aos/1176347008 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2006282518 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / DOI
 
Property / DOI: 10.1214/AOS/1176347008 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:32, 10 December 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Second order and \(L^ p\)-comparisons between the boostrap and empirical Edgeworth expansion methodologies
scientific article

    Statements

    Second order and \(L^ p\)-comparisons between the boostrap and empirical Edgeworth expansion methodologies (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1989
    0 references
    The boostrap estimate of distribution functions of studentized statistics is shown to be more accurate than even the two-term empirical Edgeworth expansion, thus strengthening the claim of superiority of the boostrap over the normal approximation method. The two methods are compared not only with respect to bounded bowl-shaped loss functions but also with respect to squared error loss and, more generally, in \(L^ p\)-norms.
    0 references
    Cramer's condition
    0 references
    Lp-norms
    0 references
    boostrap estimate
    0 references
    studentized statistics
    0 references
    two-term empirical Edgeworth expansion
    0 references
    normal approximation
    0 references
    bounded bowl-shaped loss functions
    0 references
    squared error loss
    0 references

    Identifiers