From Boole to Leggett-Garg: epistemology of Bell-type inequalities (Q310469): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q59122253, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711574657256 |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: 1605.04887 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: XII. On the theory of probabilities / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5600508 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Einstein Was Right! / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q2884962 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Understanding quantum measurement from the solution of dynamical models / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5797024 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A Mathematician’s Viewpoint to Bell’s theorem: In Memory of Walter Philipp / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Contextual approach to quantum formalism / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Is the contextuality loophole fatal for the derivation of Bell inequalities? / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5569065 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4942086 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 13:00, 12 July 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | From Boole to Leggett-Garg: epistemology of Bell-type inequalities |
scientific article |
Statements
From Boole to Leggett-Garg: epistemology of Bell-type inequalities (English)
0 references
8 September 2016
0 references
Summary: In 1862, George Boole derived an inequality for variables that represents a demarcation line between possible and impossible experience. This inequality forms an important milestone in the epistemology of probability theory and probability measures. In 1985 Leggett and Garg derived a physics related inequality, mathematically identical to Boole's, that according to them represents a demarcation between macroscopic realism and quantum mechanics. We show that a wide gulf separates the ''sense impressions'' and corresponding data, as well as the postulates of macroscopic realism, from the mathematical abstractions that are used to derive the inequality of Leggett and Garg. If the gulf can be bridged, one may indeed derive the said inequality, which is then clearly a demarcation between possible and impossible experience: it cannot be violated and is not violated by quantum theory. This implies that the Leggett-Garg inequality does not mean that the SQUID flux is not there when nobody looks, as Leggett and Garg suggest, but instead that the probability measures may not be what Leggett and Garg have assumed them to be, when no data can be secured that directly relate to them. We show that similar considerations apply to other quantum interpretation-puzzles such as two-slit experiments.
0 references