Detecting tampering in a random hypercube (Q388876): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Normalize DOI. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1214/EJP.v18-2290 / rank | |||
Property / DOI | |||
Property / DOI: 10.1214/EJP.V18-2290 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 16:05, 9 December 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Detecting tampering in a random hypercube |
scientific article |
Statements
Detecting tampering in a random hypercube (English)
0 references
17 January 2014
0 references
Let us assume the graph of the hypercube \(H_2^n\), and let us consider its random subgraph obtained by deleting each edge with probability \(1-p_n\). Another measure on subgraphs of \(H_2^n\) can be obtained by additionally adding edges along a randomly chosen geodesic (that is, a path which makes one step in every of the \(n\) directions). Yet another measure can be obtained by adding edges along a randomly chosen geodesic starting at a fixed vertex of the hypecube. These additional modifications are called ``tamperings''. The paper studies the question how different these three measures are. The qualitative asymptotic behavior of the total variation distance of these measures as a function of \(p_n\)'s is described.
0 references
random graph
0 references
random hypercube
0 references