Optimal scaling for partially updating MCMC algorithms (Q997939): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5560061 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: From Metropolis to diffusions: Gibbs states and optimal scaling. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3999383 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3721531 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Weak convergence and optimal scaling of random walk Metropolis algorithms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal Scaling of Discrete Approximations to Langevin Diffusions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimal scaling for various Metropolis-Hastings algorithms. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4363938 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Langevin diffusions and Metropolis-Hastings algorithms / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3763296 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:16, 26 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Optimal scaling for partially updating MCMC algorithms
scientific article

    Statements

    Optimal scaling for partially updating MCMC algorithms (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    8 August 2007
    0 references
    Asymptotic behavior of the random walk Metropolis-within-Gibbs (RWM) and Metropolis adjusted Langevin-within-Gibbs (MALA) algorithms of MCMC sampling are considered in the case when the dimensionality of the sampling space \(d\to\infty\) and the dimensionality of the proposed jump at each step is \(cd\) for some fixed \(0\leq c\leq 1 \). The limit average acceptance rate is evaluated for these algorithms in the case when the target distribution consists of i.i.d. entries and in the case of an exchangeable normal target, e.g., in the i.i.d. case the optimal acceptance rate for RWM is 0.234. The authors conclusion is that while full dimensional Langevein updates are worthwhile, full-dimensional Metropolis ones are asymptotically no better then smaller dimensional updating schemes. Results of simulations are presented.
    0 references
    Metropolis algorithm
    0 references
    Langevin algorithm
    0 references
    Markov chain Monte Carlo
    0 references
    weak convergence
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references